← Back to search

io.github.CSOAI-ORG/llm-compliance-comparison-mcp

CSOAI-ORG Scanned 17h ago

Llm Compliance Comparison tools for AI agents. Capabilities: compare providers, recommend fo...

C
72.3 / 100

Versions

No versions found.

PermissionsTool SafetyAuthAnnotationsCode QualityStabilitySpecVuln HistoryAuthorTransparencyCommunity

Tools 5

compare_providers
annotations: none low

Compare LLM providers (Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Llama, Mistral) against governance standards. Score providers on transparency, safety, data governance, and accountability. Args: providers: List of providers to compare (default all 5): ["claude", "gpt4", "gemini", "llama", "mistral"] comparison_criteria: Specific criteria: ["transparency", "safety", "data_governance", "accountability", "eu_ai_act"] framework: Governance framework focus: "all", "eu_ai_act", "nist", "iso42001", "gdpr", "csoai" caller: Caller identifier for rate limiting tier: Access tier (free/pro) Behavior: This tool is read-only and stateless — it produces analysis output without modifying any external systems, databases, or files. Safe to call repeatedly with identical inputs (idempotent). Free tier: 10/day rate limit. Pro tier: unlimited. No authentication required for basic usage. When to use: Use this tool when you need to assess, audit, or verify compliance requirements. Ideal for gap analysis, readiness checks, and generating compliance documentation. When NOT to use: Do not use as a substitute for qualified legal counsel. This tool provides technical compliance guidance, not legal advice.

tier str caller str api_key str framework str providers string comparison_criteria string
recommend_for_use_case
annotations: none low

Given a use case and jurisdiction, recommend the most compliant LLM provider. Considers regulatory requirements, data residency, safety needs, and deployment constraints. Args: use_case: Description of the intended use case (e.g. "medical triage assistant", "content moderation") jurisdiction: Primary jurisdiction: "eu", "us", "canada", "uk", "global", "apac" data_sensitivity: Data sensitivity level: "low", "medium", "high", "critical" self_hosting_required: Whether the model must be self-hostable (on-premises/private cloud) budget_constraint: Budget level: "minimal", "moderate", "flexible", "enterprise" caller: Caller identifier for rate limiting tier: Access tier (free/pro) Behavior: This tool is read-only and stateless — it produces analysis output without modifying any external systems, databases, or files. Safe to call repeatedly with identical inputs (idempotent). Free tier: 10/day rate limit. Pro tier: unlimited. No authentication required for basic usage. When to use: Use this tool when you need to assess, audit, or verify compliance requirements. Ideal for gap analysis, readiness checks, and generating compliance documentation. When NOT to use: Do not use as a substitute for qualified legal counsel. This tool provides technical compliance guidance, not legal advice.

tier str caller str api_key str use_case str jurisdiction str data_sensitivity str budget_constraint str self_hosting_required bool
provider_risk_profile
annotations: none low

Generate a detailed risk profile for a specific LLM provider. Covers vendor risk, data handling, regulatory compliance, operational risks, and AI-specific risks. Args: provider: Provider ID: "claude", "gpt4", "gemini", "llama", "mistral" deployment_context: Context: "enterprise", "startup", "government", "healthcare", "finance" caller: Caller identifier for rate limiting tier: Access tier (free/pro) Behavior: This tool generates structured output without modifying external systems. Output is deterministic for identical inputs. No side effects. Free tier: 10/day rate limit. Pro tier: unlimited. No authentication required for basic usage. When to use: Use this tool when you need to assess, audit, or verify compliance requirements. Ideal for gap analysis, readiness checks, and generating compliance documentation. When NOT to use: Do not use as a substitute for qualified legal counsel. This tool provides technical compliance guidance, not legal advice.

tier str caller str api_key str provider str deployment_context str
compliance_matrix
annotations: none low

Generate a compliance matrix showing all providers against all frameworks. Shows coverage status per provider per framework with rationale. Args: frameworks: Governance frameworks to assess against: ["eu_ai_act", "gdpr", "nist_rmf", "iso42001", "soc2", "aida"] providers: Providers to include (default all 5) caller: Caller identifier for rate limiting tier: Access tier (free/pro) Behavior: This tool generates structured output without modifying external systems. Output is deterministic for identical inputs. No side effects. Free tier: 10/day rate limit. Pro tier: unlimited. No authentication required for basic usage. When to use: Use this tool when you need to assess, audit, or verify compliance requirements. Ideal for gap analysis, readiness checks, and generating compliance documentation. When NOT to use: Do not use as a substitute for qualified legal counsel. This tool provides technical compliance guidance, not legal advice.

tier str caller str api_key str providers string frameworks string
crosswalk_providers
annotations: none low

Map LLM provider safety policies to CSOAI Partnership Charter articles. Shows how each provider's governance aligns with CSOAI's 52-article framework. Args: providers: Providers to map (default all 5) csoai_articles: Specific CSOAI articles to map (or all mapped articles if omitted) caller: Caller identifier for rate limiting tier: Access tier (free/pro) Behavior: This tool is read-only and stateless — it produces analysis output without modifying any external systems, databases, or files. Safe to call repeatedly with identical inputs (idempotent). Free tier: 10/day rate limit. Pro tier: unlimited. No authentication required for basic usage. When to use: Use this tool when you need to assess, audit, or verify compliance requirements. Ideal for gap analysis, readiness checks, and generating compliance documentation. When NOT to use: Do not use as a substitute for qualified legal counsel. This tool provides technical compliance guidance, not legal advice. Behavioral Transparency: - Side Effects: This tool is read-only and produces no side effects. It does not modify any external state, databases, or files. All output is computed in-memory and returned directly to the caller. - Authentication: No authentication required for basic usage. Pro/Enterprise tiers require a valid MEOK API key passed via the MEOK_API_KEY environment variable. - Rate Limits: Free tier: 10 calls/day. Pro tier: unlimited. Rate limit headers are included in responses (X-RateLimit-Remaining, X-RateLimit-Reset). - Error Handling: Returns structured error objects with 'error' key on failure. Never raises unhandled exceptions. Invalid inputs return descriptive validation errors. - Idempotency: Fully idempotent — calling with the same inputs always produces the same output. Safe to retry on timeout or transient failure. - Data Privacy: No input data is stored, logged, or transmitted to external services. All processing happens locally within the MCP server process.

tier str caller str api_key str providers string csoai_articles string

Permissions 3

network medium
Server uses network capabilities via: urllib
filesystem low
Server uses filesystem capabilities via: open(), os
env_vars low
Server uses env_vars capabilities via: os.environ

Scan Findings 32

low
Tool 'compare_providers' has no annotations annotation_checker · 100%
low
Tool 'recommend_for_use_case' has no annotations annotation_checker · 100%
low
Tool 'provider_risk_profile' has no annotations annotation_checker · 100%
low
Tool 'compliance_matrix' has no annotations annotation_checker · 100%
low
Tool 'crosswalk_providers' has no annotations annotation_checker · 100%
high
Remote transport without authentication auth_checker · 70%
info
Sandbox failed to start for behavioral verification behavioral_verifier · 100%
medium
Vulnerable dependency: mcp@1.0.0 (GHSA-3qhf-m339-9g5v) dependency_analyzer · 95%
medium
Vulnerable dependency: mcp@1.0.0 (GHSA-9h52-p55h-vw2f) dependency_analyzer · 95%
medium
Vulnerable dependency: mcp@1.0.0 (GHSA-j975-95f5-7wqh) dependency_analyzer · 95%
medium
Vulnerable dependency: mcp@1.0.0 (GHSA-jpw9-pfvf-9f58) dependency_analyzer · 95%
medium
Vulnerable dependency: mcp@1.0.0 (GHSA-vj7q-gjh5-988w) dependency_analyzer · 95%
medium
Vulnerable dependency: mcp@1.0.0 (PYSEC-2026-1616) dependency_analyzer · 95%
medium
Vulnerable dependency: mcp@1.0.0 (PYSEC-2026-1617) dependency_analyzer · 95%
medium
Vulnerable dependency: mcp@1.0.0 (PYSEC-2026-1618) dependency_analyzer · 95%
medium
Vulnerable dependency: mcp@1.0.0 (PYSEC-2026-3482) dependency_analyzer · 95%
medium
Vulnerable dependency: mcp@1.0.0 (PYSEC-2026-3483) dependency_analyzer · 95%
info
package.json metadata manifest_parser · 100%
info
pyproject.toml metadata manifest_parser · 100%
info
Tool: compare_providers manifest_parser · 90%
info
Tool: recommend_for_use_case manifest_parser · 90%
info
Tool: provider_risk_profile manifest_parser · 90%
info
Tool: compliance_matrix manifest_parser · 90%
info
Tool: crosswalk_providers manifest_parser · 90%
info
Transport: streamable-http manifest_parser · 80%
info
Required env vars (1) manifest_parser · 80%
info
Sandbox failed to start for output poisoning scan output_poisoning · 100%
medium
Permission: network access detected permission_analyzer · 80%
low
Permission: filesystem access detected permission_analyzer · 80%
low
Permission: env_vars access detected permission_analyzer · 90%
info
No dependency files found for SBOM generation sbom_generator · 100%
medium
No build provenance detected (SLSA L0) slsa_assessor · 90%